- DRIVE MAP FILLS WITH BLUE BLOCKS DURING DEFRAG PROFESSIONAL
- DRIVE MAP FILLS WITH BLUE BLOCKS DURING DEFRAG WINDOWS
Most of the time if a computer is having troubles it's because of something else. As I never said it was an end all fix for something, I said that there is a noticeable difference in a system that hasn't been defragged in a while and one that has. I technically currently work at Best Buy, and defragging isn't a solution, it helps. You can use either tool as part of a frequent and regular maintenance program to maintain the optimum performance of NTFS volumes."Īctually, it's from the people who designed the OS that runs on the file system, I'm pretty sure that they're going to be able to tell if the OS will run better on a fragmented drive or not, despite any MS bashing
DRIVE MAP FILLS WITH BLUE BLOCKS DURING DEFRAG PROFESSIONAL
"Windows XP Professional provides two methods of defragmenting NTFS volumes: the Disk Defragmenter snap-in and the new defrag command-line tool. This is most noticeable if you're on a fast mount like a griffin.
on a heavily (and I mean heavily) fragmented drive moving from area to area involves significant stutter, possibly because the game is loading in data for the new area. Does not sound like they're saying that defrag is unneccessary. Sounds like XP does minimal defrag to benefit boot and load times of frequently used programs.
DRIVE MAP FILLS WITH BLUE BLOCKS DURING DEFRAG WINDOWS
Once every three days, by default, Windows XP will perform a partial defragmentation and adjust the layout of the disk based upon current use. Therefore, it is a good idea to defragment the disk following an installation. While Windows XP will automatically reposition some files to improve performance, this will generally be done infrequently and will usually include only a small fraction of the files on the disk. Files and directories that are heavily fragmented or dispersed across the disk will hurt performance. I/O performance is strongly influenced by the layout of files on disk. Tell me I'm wrong all you want, I'll believe it when I stop seeing computers with XP and NTFS come in that work much better after a good defrag Quite simply, you will almost never read in a single file from start to finish with no interruptions, so defragmenting files buys you nothing.įurther, Windows XP intentionally fragments the drive in various ways, in order to optimize OS and program startup.Ĭlaiming that defragmentation is a real problem on XP is just plain incorrect. NTFS does not have problems with fragmentation. You don't know what you're talking about. If you're telling me a drive never requires defragmentation, then you apparently don't know how a drive becomes fragmented. Just because the file system is modern day type doesn't mean it doesn't require defragmentation. I haven't been here long, but I doubt that's how it works. Trying to convince people here that you know what you're talking about by putting out horribly incorrect information. This means that a brand new file, if your drive is fragmented enough, could be written to your drive fragmented, because there aren't enough sequential sectors to put the complete file into.Īnd that's the first time I've heard someone say that having a file spread out on a drive, let alone multiple files spread out individually on a drive, and then attempting to do something with them is faster than having those files individually in one place where the read time is less because the computer does not have to search for the file locations as much.Īhh, LordHunter, the guys around the office and I shared a good laugh at your comments. Just because a filesystem attempts to write files to one place does not mean that it alsways successful. The filesystem OTOH, is intentionally designed to perform it's I/O in ways so that fragmentation is irrelevant: generally, it tries to write data out in the manner it thinks it most likely will be read back in the future.Īs it turns out, fragmentation may actually yield better performance than sequential layout if you're reading multiple files at once. The user, as a rule, doesn't have to do anything at all. So enlighten me- how do you do it? I just use the filesystem.
0 kommentar(er)
